Creative Rewards & Public Acknowledgement

Standard

These two amazing ladies each handled over 25,000 interactions a piece in 2019, leading the way for an incredible year of growth.

My leadership team and I recently oversaw some of the largest year-over-year contact center volume growth I have ever been a part of. Our center grew by 40% and the answer rates actually went up by 3%! That’s insane. Most impressive was that labor costs and headcount did NOT grow anywhere near that 40% increase. It was marginal. How? GREAT TALENT!!!

We took time out to acknowledge two of our hardest working performers for digging in, finding the most efficient way to perform the job as it changed, and setting the standard across the division. Keya (left) and Desi (right) were paraded around the building like the call center queens that they are, tiaras and all! We then took them out to lunch and had a nice 2 hour escape to talk about their 2019.

And like most amazing employees they continued to go above and beyond. When we discussed the future of our department, both chimed in with the need for more team building. One suggested a team outing that centered around community service. The other proposed a team escape room exercise. Brilliant. I love working with people. These two are the reason why this latest project was an immense success.

At the end of the day we want our best and brightest to know they are valued, we want the environment to know they are valued, and we want to include them in the overall management strategy. Thank you Keya and Desi for being so awesome.

TEXT SENT: “We’re parting ways today…”

Standard

This isn’t what I would recommend actually saying, but it is what we’re actually thinking. It’s disappointing all the way around.

To text or not to text, that is the management question. The answer is TEXT. Yes, it is appropriate to text an employee work-based messages, up to and including termination.

Surrounded by some of the BEST human resources talent in the country, an enormous emphasis had been placed on me when I was a younger manager to put myself in the shoes of the employee on the chopping block. Are we communicating the performance needs and requirements clearly, are we coaching the best behaviors to drive those results, are we capturing and acknowledging whether or not the performer’s behaviors are changing, are we interpreting the results (good or bad) alongside the performer? And most importantly, are we being humane and professional about it all?

But what happens to these intentions when the performer suddenly ghosts us? We wake up eager to turn things around, but they’re simply GONE. Maybe they’re being honest with themselves and agree they cannot become what it is the business and its customers need? “Ah Jesus, I can’t take this guy breathing down my ass anymore. I’ll just work on my Fortnight and figure it out somehow.” Regardless, I had been taught to at least attempt to have an exit conversation. The professional element was important to preserve. Thank the employee for trying, confirm what their final decision is so you can formally terminate the relationship, and make a personal decision to spend your emotional energy on another teammate.

If they’re not going to be an adult and communicate professionally, then we need to just bite the bullet and send that final text. The goal transitions from being professional to making sure there’s no confusion. You’re out. Don’t come back. If you need anything, don’t come to me for it.

Where does this bring us? If we’re acknowledging that it can be acceptable to terminate employment via text, then it’s justifiable to work most other things out via text as well. This is where we are. Your call will get pushed to voicemail, but your text will be delivered, seen, and responded to. I’ve seen it time and time again. Just make sure you screen grab and file everything, because this is a new folder of manager-to-employee communications, and you will indeed need this content for the inevitable post-employment conflict.

Game-ification #Win

Standard

I don’t like to #Fail. Sooooo, I brought a different concept to the office to give Gamification in the workplace another shot. This time, it worked. All it took was a 3 foot tall RED ONION.

My latest challenge in operations management takes place at a home improvement firm, specifically the call center. The call center is relatively young to the business, and it’s purpose is still being defined. Right now it functions as a sales lead generator and a sales appointment preserver. On the sales preservation side, the team takes and makes customer calls to set and confirm appointments. The most important task? Preventing cancellations.

Have you ever cancelled a recurring service, or even an annual subscription? The best providers have a tried and true method to identify why you are cancelling, meaningful responses and solutions to keep you as a customer, and measureable results that show the teams’ ability to save accounts. All of this requires commitment, training, and effort. DirecTV does an amazing job of this, always offering free content or billings rebates, maybe even equipment upgrades to ensure your continued loyalty. I reviewed hundreds of the teams recorded phone calls and realized my newly inherited team lacked training and consistency with regards to asking questions and being persistent. I went to Fathead.com and ordered a large onion, boxing glove, and goalie mask.

I decided to leverage symbols associated with the desired behaviors and results, and empower peer-to-peer recognition to drive change. The rules? If anyone inside or outside of the call center heard a teammate asking multiple and meaningful questions about why a customer was cancelling their appointment, we handed that person the ONION (stripping back layers of the onion, finding the hidden or unspoken reason why a customer intends to cancel). If someone heard a teammate fighting through objections and putting a visible amount of emotional effort and focus into saving the appointment, they got the BOXING GLOVE. And finally, if they saved the appointment and convinced the customer to give us their time, they got the GOALIE (Saaaaaaaaave!). Everyone could give or receive any of the symbols multiple times within a day.

Within the next 3 weeks we had increased the number of scheduled appointments remaining on-schedule by +25% (a large improvement for this environment). We had achieved the intended result; however, there were a handful of unforeseen benefits that compounded our overall divisional performance improvement. The Sales side of the division had begun to take and use symbols like the BOXING GLOVE! They heard their sales peers countering objections with reasonable responses and controlling questions, and they decided to join in on the game. I ultimately got them a few symbols to use specific to their skill set (a large $100 bill for scheduling appointments within the same day, a very impactful result that often leads to a sale). Additionally, other company executives and leaders saw the symbols, visited the call center, and engaged with teammates asking “Tell me about the ONION?” Needless to say, the entire concept made changing and evolving more stimulating, drenched the environment in awareness around desired behaviors, and celebrated real-time change and results.

Further cementing the concept’s success was its carryover into owning customer interactions and asking customers purposeful questions. These actions are always a hallmark for success in sales. The Sales portion of the call center had begun to ask deeper questions about customer needs, and they began to fight harder when a customer would object (respectfully, refuse to accept “NO” for an answer). Through Mid-August call center sales were forecasted to close +50% above the prior month’s totals. Gamification #Win!

Gamification #Fail

Standard

Games. We play games for entertainment. You win games, you lose games. Gamification of the workplace is a millennial-driven concept that originates from the simple “celebration” of achievements in the video game world. These celebrations are trophies and badges unique to the accomplishment. Kill the wizard; silver trophy. Kill the wizard without a scratch on you; GOLD trophy.

The Gamification of the workplace is a theoretical concept creeping its way into modern performance management. I really enjoy testing this theory, but the balance between what a group considers stimulating and not is thin and sensitive. As you have seen on this blog, I have leveraged different methods of celebrating the accomplishment of individual and team based goals. BUBBLES was my fun and stimulating vehicle for extraordinary performance without excessive over-compensation (extravagant bonuses, etc.). Hit a daily sales goal? I run a bubble machine and drench you in colorful joy. Team hits a group goal, everyone gets bubbled. My sales team loved it. My new concept was an attempt to evolve.

The new idea I had? #Fail

Here’s the new idea. It revolves around an Instax Mini instant camera with the small “Polaroid” photos. You may have seen this. Maybe you own one. If you haven’t heard of it, use this as a barometer of your current social awareness. The Instax Mini was fully loaded with film and a battery, and teammates were compelled to take a photo of one another whenever they felt like a teammate did something “amazing.” Totally subjective. I know. Once you take a photo of “Mikey” for “helping a teammate close a $10k sale” you wrote the reason for the picture (we’ll call this the “Trophy”) on the bottom of the photograph and taped the photo on the wall next to our big screen television that displays all sales performance data. I was using the Instax Mini throughout the Holiday season, and every time I whipped it out and snapped a shot we had a blast. People were amused by the instant picture process, never mind assigning some sort of purpose to it beyond old school selfies.

I tried to get the ball rolling, snapping shots of people whenever they completed a valuable task, h\wrote the reason, then slapped it on the wall. It didn’t catch fire. I had to constantly remind the team to take pictures whenever they felt compelled. I bought 60 pictures, assuming I’d blow through them in 2 weeks. We used only 18 photos in 30 days, 10 of them MINE.

Why so low? Why such a limp response? How could bubbles get such a strong response, and instant photos flop so acutely?

Upon much reflection the answer was quite obvious. What do most of us know about women and having their picture taken? They don’t like it unless their appearance is up to their standard. The company I am currently supporting has a business casual dress code, and by sheer randomness the entire sales team is female. Sometimes my teammates come in dressed to the 9’s, while other times… Let’s just say they take full advantage of the term “casual.” What? People don’t want unflattering and poorly developed instant camera photographs of them hanging publicly in a highly visible place within their professional home? They never admitted it, but that’s what happened.

I should’ve known better. Hopefully, my pain is your gain! SAY CHEESE!

5 Things I Hate About LinkedIn

Standard

Hateful-Mike.GIF

There are so many things I love about Linkedin, but there are a handful of things I hate about LinkedIn. I’m tired of shooting rainbows at everyone. Here’s some realness. Microsoft acquired LinkedIn so the window for change is wide open. These are the top 5 things I hate about LinkedIn:

Dumb Endorsements

Ever been harassed by LinkedIn to endorse a connection’s acumen with some buzz-word skill like “Microsoft Word” or “Microsoft Office”? Are these skills really worth endorsing? Why not toss “Prepares Own Lunch” and “Wears Clothing” in there too. Look, some people have more skills than others, for now. Some people are building their careers, or building their profiles. Either way, please stop pulling key words from weaker profiles and shoving them in our faces to pretend they’re a meaningful skill requiring cross reference. It’s insulting to me, but more importantly t’s insulting the profile being digitally patronized. LinkedIn needs to edit their list of active endorsable buzz-words and skim the pile to eliminate senseless options.

Constant Nagging

Go to your profile and there’s a 200% chance LinkedIn will browbeat you like an overbearing parent, “Fix your profile! Tell me what clubs you’re in! What have you achieved professionally? Your profile pic smile is yellowish, brush more often!” I get that new features require training or a prompt, but visiting my profile feels like battling 90’s-era pop-up ads. If I click the small “X” once, can we assume I have no future want to update my stuff?

No Homemade Video

Holy God. LinkedIn, have you not seen the trends? Everything hot in social media is video (stop pretending that LinkedIn isn’t a form of social media). Our Facebook feeds were once an endless stream of repetitive memes, but now it’s 75% video content that auto-plays the moment you’ve scrolled towards it. Of all things LinkedIn has chosen to copycat (most of Facebook’s LIKE + COMMENT + SHARE = ENGAGEMENT formula is there), why disregard this one? Users can’t upload a cell phone video unless it’s attached to YouTube, etc. That’s so 2005.

Vacant Profiles

Prune the bushes once in a while LinkedIn. Why allow dead limbs, with their brown withered networking leaves, to choke the user base rose garden? For example, there are 2 LinkedIn profiles for Michael Gambuto (specifically, me). One is active, daily; one is dormant, for years. I mean YEARS. It has 2 connections. It hasn’t been touched in a decade. I have no idea why it’s there or how to rid of it. Don’t you want the user base to be one of quality and not quantity? Knock down the vacant LinkedIn slums.

Meaningless Activity

My LinkedIn app will pop on iOS with a red circular “2” by its icon. Do I have 2 new connections? Do I have 2 new direct messages? Maybe 2 people have endorsed me? NOPE! It means two of my connections have reacted to or engaged with their own or someone else’s content. If this is the new standard for “Alerts” than they’re on their way to becoming “the app that cried wolf” via #DigitalFib. Stop forcing the perception that LinkedIn is a happening hub of constant networking that we should check on each and every hour. It already is, and most active users already do. After all, do you really care if Person-X clicked “LIKE” on some business stranger’s COMMENT about a company you DON’T follow? Welcome to LinkedIn updates, 2016.

There ya go Microsoft! Give LinkedIn a tune-up!